Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

ADD A NEW IDEA

Azure DevOps Services and Server

Showing 113

Support ADO deployment controls syncing to Aha!

What is the challenge? ADO has released the ability to visualize deployment controls within an ADO record. In order to share this information with product management, this information needs to be able to sync back to Aha! via the ADO integration. ...
Bonnie Trei about 10 hours ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0

Fix the bug in date syncing between AHA and ADO

What is the challenge? Dates added on AHA/ADO are not properly synced and show up on the other tool as +/- 1 day as a result of time differences between the two tools. Expected behaviour: When selecting a date in one tool, the same date appears in...
Guest about 13 hours ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0

Support syncing of editing existing comments via ADO

What is the challenge? Editing existing comments in ADO do not sync back correctly in Aha! What is the impact? Comments can become out of date and not contain the correct information. Describe your idea Sync edits to existing comments
Stuart Blair about 1 month ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Sending child records to one ADO project should not error out if parent record is integrated to a different Workspace and ADO project

What is the challenge? Users are now able to support linking work between multiple Aha! workspaces and multiple ADO projects with parent/child relationships spanning this; however one scenario is producing an error. When a parent record is integra...
Stephanie Lechner about 2 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 1 Likely to implement

Import items even if a parent is not available due to security restrictions

What is the challenge? Some of our work items (e.g. a feature) in ADO are linked to security related parents (e.g. an epic) in ADO. We are not able to access the parent work item due to these security settings. However we would like to see the fea...
Tobias Getz about 2 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Add ability to map Created by Field between Aha! and ADO Server accounts

What is the challenge? Currently there are a few user fields from ADO server accounts available to map to Aha!'s Created by User, but the Created By user is not displaying as an option. What is the impact? Users are unable to map the created by fi...
Stephanie Lechner 3 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Allow use of Mapped fields template with one field difference for each integration

What is the challenge? Can't use Mapping Integration template. Have to update multiple integration for every mapping change since one has to be different. What is the impact? Would save a ton of time for our team. Describe your idea We have around...
Alex Berestenko 4 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Integrate ideas with ADO

What is the challenge? There is no easy way to send ideas to engineering to work on or keep the information in sync. What is the impact? Time spent copy and pasting data. Out-of-date information leading to confusion. Describe your idea Like the re...
Kelly Sebes 5 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server  / Ideas / Wanted 0 Future consideration

Handle multi-select fields in ADO integration

What is the challenge? Running into an issue where multi-select from Aha can't flow over to ADO multi-select field. Only first value flows over from Aha. What is the impact? Can't use multi-select field in ADO properly. Describe your idea Allow fo...
Alex Berestenko 6 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Bi-directional support for Area Level fields in ADO integration

What is the challenge? Currently we offer Area Level fields in our ADO integration for each Area Level. This allows us to receive the unique Area Level from ADO, but currently updates in Aha! do not change the Area Level back in ADO despite the se...
Stephanie Lechner 7 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration