Features
Sort by:
Trending
Status:
Future consideration
Showing 733
1
VOTE
2
VOTE
Change feature rank standard field name
Who would benefit? User utilizing the prioritization page for features, and other record types What impact would it make? Reduce confusion on feature rank vs prioritization rank How should it work? Change the name of the standard field Feature ran...
0
Future consideration
65
VOTE
Updating of Feature dates should automatically adjust dates of features with downstream dependencies
Summary:
This comes from a project management use case where a team manages a set of activities/tasks through Features for a project and the activities have a very sequential delivery with fixed offsets between each activity. The plan starts off...
10
Future consideration
4
VOTE
Allow for additional fields to be included when drafting release notes
Who would benefit? Technical Writers and consumers of product release notes What impact would it make? It allows us to include additional information beyond just a text summary of new features. How should it work? After selecting records to draft ...
0
Future consideration
59
VOTE
5
VOTE
Include linked record/relationship field as an option for automated scorecard metrics
It would be valuable to be able to include standard fields that are derived from linked records in automated scorecard metrics. For example, I may want to create a metric that assigns a score based on the name of the goal(s) that a feature is asso...
2
Future consideration
68
VOTE
2
VOTE
Nest or group to-do items together
Who would benefit? PMs, Product Ops, docs team, What impact would it make? Easier to use and navigate to-do lists within discrete phases How should it work? I'd like to be able to nest or group to-do checklist items under a higher-level checklist ...
0
Future consideration
67
VOTE
20
VOTE
